Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Saturday, Apr 29, 2006

Cross Currency

Group Sites

Home Page - Financial Services
Industry & Economy - Economic Offences
Markets - Regulatory Bodies & Rulings

Karvy refutes SEBI charges

Our Bureau

Questions the role of banks; claims no malafide intention on its part

"This is baseless and simply based on the concerned bank along with the said individuals who seemed to have acted in collusion and now shifting the blame."

Hyderabad , April 28

The Karvy Group has refuted charges made by the Securities and Exchange Board of India in its interim order barring the group from depository participant and other services.

Karvy Stock Broking Ltd (KSBL) was named as one of the 85 entities that had acted as a financer of the master accountholders who appear to be the ultimate beneficiaries in the IPO scam. The order refers to KSBL as financer to one Mr D.B. Mehta in the NTPC issue.

In a press release, Karvy said KSBL had never financed any IPO customer till date. Neither KSBL nor any of Karvy associate companies financed the said investor for the issue.

"This investor has a secondary market trading account with KSBL Mumbai branch, and he had transferred shares into our pool account on the day the securities were listed and sold the shares in the market. SEBI appears to have mistaken the transfer of securities into our pool account by a customer, who was subsequently paid the proceeds, as a wrongful act of Karvy," the release said.

SEBI had alluded that the certificates of introduction, issued by bankers for DP accounts, were forged and were issued with the connivance of Karvy. "This is baseless and simply based on the concerned bank along with the said individuals, who seemed to have acted in collusion and now shifting the blame. The fact that the collusion of the banks with these individuals can be borne out of the fact that all these fictitious individuals were given loans and the refunds credited to the said accounts. If these bank certificates were issued without the knowledge of the concerned bank, then how did these banks issue loans to such applicants without a bank account and how did they credit the refunds, either given piecemeal or in a consolidated form, to respective loan accounts?" Karvy pointed out.

No malafide intent

Further, according to Karvy, "Should Karvy have acted with a malafide intent or they have been benefited unduly, then they should have received the benefit either by way of shares or funds by way of profit realised on these shares. SEBI has all means to verify whether such benefits have been received and has not identified even a single case of such benefits being accrued. Karvy has not received any undue benefits whatsoever."

Karvy also said, "We believe that the inspection of our operations undertaken by the depositories or SEBI did not reveal any serious violation, especially those with a malafide intent."

More Stories on : Financial Services | Economic Offences | Regulatory Bodies & Rulings

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page

Stories in this Section
Cyclone Mala churns into Category 4 status

Indiabulls Sec gets a breather
SEBI order harsh; we are victims of fraud: Karvy
Karvy refutes SEBI charges
Fictitious demat a/cs opened in 2003 itself
Grasim to spend Rs 4,500 cr on capex
Inflation up on costlier fuel, manufactured items
`Work environment vital to manage attrition'
GAIL net profit dips 22% in Q4
HLL Q4 net rises 76.9 pc
Bharti Airtel net up 49 pc on user growth
ATI expanding operations in India
Govt may allow wheat import by private sector
Sensex rebounds after a crash

The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright 2006, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line