Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Saturday, Mar 12, 2005

News
Features
Stocks
Port Info
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - Courts/Legal Issues


HC appoints special officer to take stock of Birla assets

Our Bureau

Kolkata , March 11

THE nine-month old Birla-Lodha feud took a significant turn on Friday with the Calcutta High Court rejecting the pleas of Mr B.K. Birla, Mr K.K. Birla and Mr Yashvardhan Birla and stating that they had no caveatable interest in the property of the late Priyamvada Devi Birla.

After hearing the four caveat petition of the Birlas, Mr Justice Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta today said that only Mr G.P. Birla, one of the executors of Priyamvada Birla's 1982 will, had a caveatable interest.

In an effort to clear the large discrepancies in the estimation of the worth of the M.P. Birla Group, the court appointed a four-member team of special officers headed by Mr Ahin Chowdhury, a senior lawyer, to take stock of the total assets of the group.

Though it appeared that this round of the feud has gone in favour Mr Lodha, the Birla camp called a press conference to clarify that they had won too. In fact, the legal team of the either side claimed victory while briefing the media.

According to the legal advisor of the Birlas and a senior partner of Khaitan & Co, Mr N.G. Khaitan, the caveatable interest of one the Birlas (Mr G.P. Birla) had been established and it gave them an avenue to fight for their ultimate cause.

"We always wanted that the property should go to charity and so we can still fight for it. It is of academic interest whether the caveatable interest of one of Birlas or all the Birlas is upheld", Mr Khaitan told reporters.

Reacting to it, Mr Debanjan Mandal of Fox & Mandal, the legal firm appointed by Mr Lodha, said that of the four petitions filed by four Birla family members, three had been turned down.

"If everything is only of academic interest, then why did they file the four caveatable petitions? It is up to you to decide who has won this first round", Mr Mandal told reporters.

Mr Justice Sengupta also said that Mr K.N. Tapuria and Mr P.K. Khaitan, executors of Priyamvada Birla's 1982 will, had a cavetable interest.

Mr Khaitan was non-committal on whether they would now file separate caveat petitions. He did not even spell out whether the Birla would oppose this order and move to a higher court.

Regarding the appointment of the special officer, both the sides indulged in self-congratulation. All along, the Birlas had urged the court to appoint a receiver and the Lodha counsel had prayed for a special officer.

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page


Stories in this Section
BHEL R&D initiatives start paying off — To market software for power stations with TCS


Friends Globe eyes retail travel services
Wockhardt gets USFDA nod for anti-ulcer drug
LIC plans to convert OFCDs
Emcure launches first 3-in-1 AIDS pill for kids
HC discharges caveatable interest of 3 Birlas over Priyamvada will
Intl refiner award for Reliance
HC appoints special officer to take stock of Birla assets
`Cos should create emotional appeal to build up image'
Ma Foi plans to acquire small, mid-size HR firms
Making MTNL a subsidiary of BSNL is best option: ICICI Sec
Dishman to acquire UK firm
Corporate governance: Clarity on Clause 49 likely
Education, code of conduct to beat corruption stressed
M&M eyeing AP to locate Logan car plant
GM expands Halol plant capacity
GAIL strikes jt venture deal with Syrian co
Mirza Tanners plans Rs 100-cr diversification — `Red Tape' retail stores to be set up
Sika to promote usage of chemicals in construction
Ivax Corp keen to expand tie-ups in India
IDEB Construction keen to partner foreign cos
Ranbaxy's R&D chief Rajinder Kumar quits
Corporate cricket in Mumbai


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright 2005, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line