Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Saturday, May 29, 2004

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Corporate - Sick Units


Inalsa told to explain reference under SICA

Richa Mishra

New Delhi , May 28

THE Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) has sought an explanation from Inalsa Appliances Ltd as to why its reference should not be rejected. Musing over the matter, the BIFR Bench noted that the company had filed a reference under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act (SICA), 1985, in September 2003.

On January 23, 2004, the Board received a letter from Delhi-based Alfa Agencies, an unsecured creditor, raising objections to the `Form A' submitted by the company before BIFR. According to the unsecured creditors, the company did not have any factory premises, industrial workers and plant machinery. Besides, the company has transformed itself from a manufacturing company into a marketing company, thereby it is no longer an industrial company under SICA, they submitted.

Further, the reference filed by the company on September 25, 2003, and received by the Board on September 29, 2003, was time barred.

The unabsorbed loss as per the audited balance sheet of the company as on March 31, 2002, was Rs 21.09 crore as against the paid-up capital of Rs 13.84 crore.

Therefore, the company was sick in the financial year ending March 31, 2002, itself, but it filed the reference under Section 15(1) of SICA beyond the stipulated period of 60 days from the date of finalisation of the duly audited accounts for the period ending March 31, 2002.

The company has preferred to file its reference based on its audited balance sheet ending March 31, 2003, the Bench noted.

The BIFR Bench also observed that in its reply dated December 10, 2003, filed before the Civil Judge, Tiz Hazari, the company has clearly stated that it has closed down its manufacturing operations and transformed itself into a marketing company only.

Further, it was now outsourcing manufacturing activities. Hence, it was clear that the company did not own an `industrial undertaking.'

More Stories on : Sick Units

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
BHEL bags Rs 647-cr order from MSEB


Matrix Labs to prepay long-term loans
Dr Reddy's: Overcoming odds
SSNNL bondholders' meet in Sept likely for buy-back
Sundram Fasteners' China plant starts commercial sales
No.1 Sundram Road
Mirza Tanners plans to set up new unit in UP
`DCA to adopt online registration by June 2005'
AmEx corp card, Taj group tie up
Liberty group sets its sights on ceramics, leather accessories
Inalsa told to explain reference under SICA
We will grow faster than any other steel co: SAIL chief
Voltas' cooling unit may contribute more
Dishman Pharma looking to shake off Solvay-centric image
New VPs for Arvind Brands



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright 2004, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line