Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Thursday, Apr 08, 2004

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Opinion - Accounting Standards


Local standards are very foreign to CAs

S. Ramanujam

S. Ramanujam on the knowledge gaps that abound in Indian accounting standards

ARE chartered accountants `feeling good' about the way accounting knowledge is imparted to them? Although there is no referendum on this, the answer is obvious if published accounts of listed companies are anything to go by. A variety of accounting practices are being followed, confusing one and all. Thus the standards have, rather than harmonise, created much divergence.

Some examples are now discussed to highlight the gaps in educating the members.

Teaching methods

Though not officially acknowledged, two standard textbooks on accounting and auditing occupied the field for long, compelling every student to learn of these. Unfortunately, failure to update them saw the developments in the accounting and auditing areas not being imparted to the new generation of accountants. Further, no attempt was made to fill this vacuum, either through articles in the journal or the holding of seminars. Thus, all types of accounting practices flourished under the very nose of the Institute and the regulatory authorities. Accountants' `prosperity' depended on their creativity to abridge account transactions. Thus was born the concept of abridged accounts followed by abridged audit reports. Accountants served the cause of their masters, leaving vast trail of uncovered scams, vanishing companies, and so on. Even mutual funds, co-operative banks and NBFCs became bankrupt with none becoming accountable for the malaise.

Pronouncement, Guidance Notes

Rather than respond to issues as an accountant or accountancy body, the ICAI always reacted keeping in mind the consequences that may arise on account of its recommendations, thereby, resulting in the total negation of accounting norms. Here are some examples:

  • Making entries for proposed dividend, provision for taxation: For long, the accounts of many corporates did not show separately the provision made regarding proposed dividend, provision for taxation, and so on. This lack of bifurcation also helped corporates escape the rigours of the Payment of Bonus Act, the Companies Profit Surtax Act, and so on.

    Under these legislation, deduction was provided on account of the capital base existing on the opening day of the accounting year, and, any bifurcation would have resulted in a lower capital base to be reflected.

    It is after much pressure that the ICAI came out with its pronouncements to say that the company should necessarily show separately, the provisions made on account of these items.

  • Statement of Guidance Note on deferred payment credit: A comment in a leading business newspaper resulted in the issue of this Guidance Note. It was pointed out that the accounting of interest followed by shipping companies, by amortising the interest over the life of the asset (ship), is incorrect as does not recognise the underlining nature of interest payment, which is a period cost.

    The article pointed out that by amortising the interest over the life of the asset, a shipping company could distribute dividends and also pay the full managerial remuneration without any curtailment. On the other hand, if the entire interest due for the financial period is provided in the accounts, there would have been no dividend nor, for that matter, any managerial remuneration. The Department of Company Affairs (DCA) stepped in and referred the matter to the Institute, which resulted in this statement being issued.

  • Capitalisation of future interest liability as well as the de-capitalisation thereafter: For enjoying higher fiscal incentives in the form of depreciation and investment allowance, many companies resorted to the capitalisation of future interest liability at the time of acquisition of asset itself, wherever the borrowings were relatable thereto by working out the entire interest payable over the future period and claiming higher depreciation/investment allowance thereof.

    This created a huge uproar and, after a couple of years, the Institute disapproved this practice. Thus, all companies started de-capitalising the interest and, at present, there is some order in the realm of capitalising interest on borrowed cost.

    The sagging link

    With growing public pressure, the Institute started linking its Standards with International Accounting Standards by making few modifications. This created a huge knowledge gap among Indian accountants who were caught unawares with regard to these new directives.

    An academic person will always wonder as to the rationale of adopting wholesomely the International Accounting Standard in the Indian context, as confusion often remains even after completing the task. Some knowledge gap situations that arose on account of adopting the International Accounting Standards are:

  • AS 16 (Accounting for Borrowed Costs): This AS recommends a complicated method, which was never followed in the Indian context by any of the corporates. A series of steps have to be followed for capitalisation.

    The standard stipulates that the capitalisation of borrowing costs should be done on weighted-average basis — weighted average with regard to the borrowings that are outstanding during the period other than specific borrowings. This apart, AS 16 also stipulates that first a capitalisation rate should be worked out in respect of borrowings of general purposes and, then, the same rate should be applied in respect of the borrowing costs. The steps identified are as follows:

    Step 1: Calculation of borrowing costs after taking into account any loan repayment, if any;

    Step 2: Calculation of average unspecified borrowing outstanding during the year;

    Step 3: Calculation of average interest on unspecified borrowings for the year;

    Step 4: Average interest rate for the year; and

    Step 5: Capitalisation of interest by applying the average rate worked out above with regard to unspecified borrowings.

    These show that neither the Institute nor any of the auditors had recommended this method to be followed by any of the corporates.

    Can it be said all the accounts of yesteryear were wrong?

  • Irrelevance of earning per share in companies — AS 20: This standard prescribes that EPS has to be worked out by dividing the net profit/loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders by the weighted average method of equity shares outstanding during the period. It is unfortunate that many companies which are on the verge of bankruptcy have to continue to work out EPS calculations to comply with this Accounting Standard which is supposed to benefit the potential investors, by showing the calculations up to four negative integers.

  • Accounting for taxes on income: A quick look at the calculation of deferred tax asset, particularly of a sick company, will reveal a paradoxical situation. The company counts initially the deferred tax liability by working out the differential depreciation between book written-down value (WDV) of assets and income-tax WDV of assets and, thereafter, reckons also a deferred tax asset on unabsorbed depreciation carried forward.

    In the case of deferred tax liability, a question was recently raised as to whether it is a liability to be deducted to find out the net worth of the company. None could answer this query convincingly, though one could draw reference to varied practices followed by lenders and investors. The Institute has not found a solution to this query.

  • Accounting for impairment of assets (AS 28): Can accounting standards be drafted colloquially? A look at this Standard, particularly the examples given in the appendix, reveals the problem. With regard to goodwill, the standard illustrates two methods — top down and bottom up.

    Both these, though illustrated to some extent in the standard, are foreign to accountants to say the least.

    Thus, Indian accountants today have a knowledge gap on account of their abrupt linkage with International Accounting Standards.

    There are no research articles of substance prepared by the Institute on any of the controversial aspects. The scene can be likened to a child dropped in a narrow lane of a jungle with the destination remaining quite invisible.

    More Stories on : Accounting Standards | Accountancy

    Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



  • Stories in this Section
    Local standards are very foreign to CAs


    Oil anxiety
    Short credits in long sentences
    When a handful shows more stones than rice
    Accounting is too serious a job for part-timers
    Sixteen going on accoun-teen!
    Forex market: The Indian script
    Nuclear weapons and Kashmir — A composite dialogue with Pakistan
    Keeping the word
    Cotton price
    ONGC shares



    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

    Copyright 2004, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line