Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, Dec 25, 2002

News
Features
Stocks
Port Info
Archives

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Courts/Legal Issues


Kerala lawyers protest hike in court fees

Our Bureau

KOCHI, Dec. 24

THE All-India Lawyers Union has voiced its protest against the State Government's decision to increase the court fee and re-introduce fee for filing writ petitions by litigants before the High Court.

The Union President, Mr Mathew Zachariah, said that the practice of paying court fee for writ petitions under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution was done away with in 1990 on the recommendation of a committee headed by Justice P. Subramonian Poti.

However, the State Government has now amended the provision and has restored court fee through an ordinance.

The court fee for filing writ petitions is fixed at Rs 100, while the fee for filing writ appeals has been raised from Rs 100 to Rs 250.

Similarly a court fee for contempt petitions has been hiked to Rs 500 and for various other petitions and applications, the fee is up 3-10 times, putting an unbearable burden on the people who go to the court for seeking justice, he said.

Describing the decision as an "anti-people" move, Mr Zachariah said that the people of the country have the fundamental right to approach the court for protecting their rights.

No restrictions should be imposed on the people either financially or otherwise for protecting their rights.

"The imposition of the court fee on writ petition under Article 226 is an unreasonable restriction on the fundamental rights of the people."

He added that the steep increase has been brought into force abruptly and without public debate and discussion.

While increasing the fees for the general public, the Government departments have been exempted from paying any court fees.

As a result, the Government could now file cases against the people without paying the requisite court fee.

According to Mr Zachariah, the contempt petitions are proceedings in which the dignity and prestige of the courts are at stake.

"The petitioner has no further role in the matter. It is for the courts to take necessary action against the persons charged with contempt by proceeding with the matter," Mr Zachariah said.

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
Comment on this article to BLFeedback@thehindu.co.in

Stories in this Section
Kerala lawyers protest hike in court fees


Steel, cement drive core sector growth in April-Nov
Rs 542-cr budget for Hyderabad council
Ecological heritage Web site launched
A paradox of poverty and plenty
TN plans second agri export zone
Vigilance fears overdone, CVC tells PSE chiefs
Pharmexcil to function from early 2003
State Govt may backtrack on MSEB trifurcation
Karnataka textile policy soon
PM's remarks on SSIs hailed
Chennai Metro Water plans tax-free bonds
No decision yet on Kochi water supply scheme
RMG David to break ground in `promising' medium radio
Prasar Bharati to run campaign on IRDA role
Rush of cars coming to drive you crazy
CII hails Naresh Chandra Panel suggestions
`50,000 looms target by 2004 unlikely'
`Biotech an effective tool in controlling pollution'
India eyes 8 pc of biotech market share
Science Congress promises something for everyone
Karnataka ranked 4th in attracting FDI
Great Eastern among 22 FDI plans okayed
Despite claims, RIDF is a flop
Corporation Bank opens ATM
`Economics crucial to diplomacy'
Govt mulls ocean freight subsidy on sugar exports
War of the roses hurts exporters
Promotion council for SEZs, EOUs
When will we have e-democracy?


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |

Copyright © 2002, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line